The Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee (PSNC) has launched a programme of work to address 21 proposals, including renaming as ‘Community Pharmacy England’.
One of the RSG proposals is for PSNC and LPCs to remove the term ‘chemist’ in general communications where possible and replace it with community pharmacy or pharmacist as ‘appropriate’.
PSNC has also been told to ‘reduce variation between LPCs’ - such as in performance, costs and governance – and ‘improve their efficiency and focus their activities’.
PSNC has introduced eight workstreams to address the RSG proposals to form the Transforming Pharmacy Representation (TAPR) programme, which will be overseen by the full PSNC committee.
The PSNC committee also said it would work with LPCs to address the six proposed directed at them, and work together with LPCs on the 10 joint PSNC and LPC proposals.
It said that work had begun on ‘early priorities’ but it also must consider how to fund the TAPR programme – and pointed to resource constraints on the team, that there are no additional levy funds available to PSNC until 2023/24, and the need for PSCN’s ‘current work to continue at pace’.
PSNC chair Sue Killen said: ‘This is a significant change programme and we have to be realistic about what is possible until we can bring in some more dedicated resource – indeed, the need to provide additional resource to PSNC was one of the RSG recommendations.’
Also commenting on the programme launch, PSNC chief executive Janet Morrison said community pharmacy contractors ‘have made it very clear through the recent contractor vote that they want to see a step-change at PSNC and the LPCs’.
This includes changes in negotiations and decision-making, communication and accountability, and how the PSNC works with contractors ‘for the benefit of the whole sector’.
She continued: ‘I know that some of the questions on contractors’ minds will be how this programme is ultimately going to help them, how their local LPC is going to be impacted, and how PSNC will make best use of the additional levies, some of which start to be directed to it from the next financial year.
‘Our work programme is still in its infancy, but I hope that through the work both we and the LPCs will be doing, the answers to these questions will become ever clearer over the coming months.’
The PSNC programme workstreams:
- Vision and strategy: This will cover the development of a new shared vision for community pharmacies which can be used to inform wider pharmacy influencing work and negotiations.
- Influencing and negotiation: This is the work needed to strengthen PSNC’s negotiating capacity and to influence effectively ahead of the next round of CPCF negotiations.
- Governance: The RSG made wide-reaching proposals to strengthen governance at PSNC and the LPCs, and this workstream will see a governance review at PSNC to address these.
- Finance and levy: The RSG proposed a redirection of a greater proportion of contractor levies towards national work, so new LPC levies need to be calculated.
- LPC support: PSNC has committed to the production of a toolkit to support LPCs to consider the proposed changes for them, and will also work with LPCs on the joint proposals.
- Engagement and joint working: This workstream will explore how PSNC can improve engagement with contractors, giving them more oversight of PSNC activities, as well as the ongoing relationship with LPCs including through the proposed Forum, and wider joint work.
- Branding and visual awareness: This workstream will explore work to rename (and rebrand) PSNC as Community Pharmacy England.
- Communications: This workstream will support communication of progress on all of the above workstreams on a regular basis, including via status reports using a traffic-light system.
Have your say
Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.