The Scottish Government should ‘hang its head in shame’ for its plans to switch some patients to greener inhalers to address the climate emergency, an asthma charity has said.
However, Martina Chukwuma-Ezike, chief executive of Asthma and Allergy Foundation, said that ‘the Scottish Government should hang its head in shame for even thinking about this’ over the ‘appalling’ plan, adding the strategy was ‘playing with people’s lives’.
If people end up going to hospital because of inadequate asthma treatment, this will lead to a bigger carbon footprint than if MDIs were prescribed, she argued.
She said: ‘I have asthma and I have an inhaler that works. If they take that away from me, I will be admitted to hospital almost every week. Even the cost of one admission will cost them more in terms of carbon emissions than if I used 20 inhalers in a year.’
Ms Chukwuma-Ezike was also doubtful that patients will only be switched following clinical review, raising concerns they will be pushed into switching.
Responding to the concerns, a Scottish Government spokesperson said: ‘New guidance will improve the way people control their asthma symptoms, meaning they are less reliant on reliever inhalers which contribute to higher carbon emissions.
‘Patients will be supported to switch to more environmentally friendly inhalers based on independent clinical judgement.’
He warned: ‘My fear is we’re going to get blanket switching without patients being seen, which will inevitably lead to worsening of asthma control and COPD control.’
Greener inhaler strategy
The strategy said that about 4.5m MDIs were dispensed in Scotland in 2020/21 for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
They accounted for more harmful emissions than the combined output from the entire NHS Scotland fleet of vehicles and waste disposal services, said the report. This is because the propellants used in MDIs are powerful greenhouse gases.
Reducing emissions from MDIs was ‘essential to achieving our net-zero goals’, the strategy said, and was ‘an area where rapid reductions in emissions are achievable’.
The UK has a high proportion of MDI use (70%) compared with the rest of Europe (< 50%) and Scandinavia (10–30%).
This could be changed by switching patients from MDIs to dry powder inhalers (DPIs), which do not use propellant and so have a far lower carbon impact.
The strategy said that DPIs were suitable for many, though not all, patients – and that changes in prescribing practices would be instrumental in reducing emissions.
Changes could include regular reviews of patients who use MDIs and, as part of the review, considering a switch to DPIs. Then, where it is clinically appropriate, patients would be supported to switch to propellant-free options, it said.
It states: ‘Prescribers, pharmacists and patients should be aware that there are significant differences in the global-warming potential of different MDIs and that inhalers with low global-warming potential should be used when they are likely to be equally effective.
‘Where there is no alternative to MDIs, lower volume HFA134a inhalers should be used in preference to large volume or HFA227ea inhalers.’
The Scottish Government said it will publish an updated Scottish Quality Respiratory Prescribing guide to help bring about changes in prescribing practices so that MDIs are only used where they are clinically necessary.
And, as there is a lack of awareness among both clinicians and the general public about how much MDIs contribute to the climate crisis, an awareness raising campaign is planned.
Health Boards in the north of Scotland are developing proposals for a pilot scheme which would capture the residual propellant and ensure its reuse.
In addition, pharmaceutical companies are working to develop low emissions propellant for MDIs.
In launching the new strategy, Scottish health secretary Humza Yousaf said that NHS Scotland is aiming to become a net-zero health service by 2040.
‘This will require unprecedented change in how we work,’ he said.
Have your say
Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.