Four out of every five pharmacist trainees passed this summer’s registration exam, where some candidates faced delays and disruption during the sitting, it has been announced.
The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) and Pharmaceutical Society of Northern Ireland (PSNI), which jointly held the exam, said that out of 2,697 candidates, 80% passed the June assessment – compared with an 82% pass rate for summer and 61% for autumn 2021.
The pass rate was highest first-time sitters at 82%, while 54% of second-time sitters passed and 65% of third-time sitters, with a total of three attempts allowed under current rules.
GPhC agreed to their request to extend the eight-year limit for taking the registration exam for affected candidates, but the protestors have further demands, including that sitting does not count towards a total number of failed attempts, for any candidate who failed the 29 June exam.
Duncan Rudkin, GPhC chief executive, acknowledged the sitting was a ‘difficult and stressful experience for many’ and apologised for ‘the problems faced by a number of candidates on the day’, pointing to a GPhC guide on the options available to unsuccessful candidates.
He added: ‘We wish the successful candidates all the best in their future careers and encourage those who were unsuccessful to make full use of our guide to help them with their next steps towards future registration and success in the profession.’
Trevor Patterson, PSNI chief executive, added: ‘We would like to apologise to those candidates that experienced disruption... and to reassure them that steps are being taken to ensure learnings from the assessment are applied.’
Also responding to the results, Colette Bradford, director of the Pharmacists’ Defence Association (PDA), said candidates ‘are now facing emotional, financial and health challenges through no fault of their own’, following ‘issues on assessment day’.
She added: ‘The PDA expects that the GPhC will continue to work with affected candidates and ensure that they take a truly empathic, supportive, and flexible approach to all appeals that they receive over the coming weeks.’
- Reasonable adjustments confirmed in writing from the GPhC/PSNI in advance of the sitting and were not fully implemented on the day
- Unacceptable levels of noise or disruption on the day which would indicate that the venue used was not fit for the purpose of a high-stakes exam sitting
- Technical difficulties which interfered with your ability to sit the assessment fairly and which were reported to the invigilator on the day
- A delay of 30 mins or more to the exam commencing, and you have not been informed by the regulator that your sitting is nullified
- A delay of 30 minutes or more for your first sitting and you have not been offered the opportunity to join the provisional register by GPhC.
Have your say
Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.