The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) has proposed that it undertakes more regular quality assurance checks of education and training providers amid changes to the pharmacist and pharmacy technician professions.
Changes suggested by the pharmacy regulator would include looking into how trainees are learning from other professions – such as student pharmacists undertaking independent prescribing training.
The regulator also said it wanted to identify and address concerns in a more timely manner by using data, annual monitoring and flexible intervention mechanisms.
And it proposed that it should set out the criteria and clear lines of responsibility for deciding whether a course or qualification should be re-approved.
The proposals will be open for consultation for 10 weeks, until 13 June 2024.
It comes as some within the pharmacy sector have expressed concerns about the training and education of pharmacy technicians as they are set to take on more responsibilities, including supplying medicines under patient group directions (PGDs).
Changes are also being made to the pharmacist profession, with independent prescribing being incorporated into the MPharm degree so that all new UK-educated pharmacists will join the register with a prescribing qualification from 2026.
GPhC chief strategy officer and deputy registrar, Mark Voce, said: ‘Pharmacy education and training sets a foundation for the knowledge, skills, understanding and professional behaviours a pharmacy student must demonstrate in order to become fully qualified and join the professional register.
‘As such it is vital that we check that training providers are meeting our standards through a quality assurance process. By doing this we are ensuring trainees are getting the right level of education to become competent practitioners of the future.
‘The changes we are proposing will help us identify issues more effectively, act more quickly if necessary and be fairer to all providers.’
And he encouraged ‘those with an interest in pharmacy education’ to take part in the consultation.
Have your say
Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.