There are no ‘specific costs’ associated with retention elements of the long-term workforce plan, NHS England’s chief executive has admitted.
Speaking at a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) session on urgent and emergency care, Amanda Pritchard confirmed that none of the £2.4bn investment in the plan will go towards workforce retention.
As well as pledging to increase pharmacist training places by 29% by 2028/29, and by nearly 50% by 2031/32, the workforce plan also committed to ensuring that 130,000 fewer staff leave the NHS over the next 15 years.
However, when asked whether there would be a cost to this retention ambition, Ms Pritchard said there is no ‘specific number’ but rather ‘a dependency on a whole number of other things’.
The chief executive argued that the ‘two big things’ about delivering on retention are flexibility and continuous career development, and these are either ‘outside the purview of this plan’ or are funded by money that is not new but has been ‘re-confirmed’ in the plan.
Members of the PAC, the select committee responsible for ensuring Government spending is effective and honest, also raised concerns about the financial costing of the plan only running to 2028.
Mark Francois MP said he was concerned ‘the true cost of this is going to be far higher’ and that the taxpayer will not be able to afford it.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) permanent secretary Sir Chris Wormald said the future budgets of his department and the NHS beyond this spending review period, which runs to 2024/25, are ‘obviously political decisions’.
He confirmed that there is no reference in the workforce plan to its cost beyond the first five years, and said ‘those are future decisions for the Government’.
When asked about the cost of retaining 130,000 extra people, Ms Pritchard said: ‘So part of what allows people to stay, to stay well, is outside the purview of this plan, so it’s to do with for example pension changes which are not costed here.
‘In terms of specific initiatives, there is confirmed continuous funding for continuous professional development so that’s not new money but it has been re-confirmed in the plan so that is going to be maintained – so not new, not extra.
‘There is also a clear set of things where there is a financial cost but it’s been dealt with separately around things like pensions, which are around flexibility.’
She added: ‘But a lot of what is in the retention section of the plan is about doing what we know works and doing that systematically and supporting that to be spread across the NHS.’
Last week, GP leaders called the Government and NHS England out on their lack of plans to retain existing GPs in the workforce plan. The section on retention did not even specifically mention GPs.
Earlier this year, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt abolished the pensions Lifetime Allowance as part of the Spring Budget in a bid to retain GPs and other doctors.
A version of this article first appeared on our sister title, Pulse.
Have your say
Please add your comment in the box below. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted. Please note that comments are not moderated before publication and the views expressed are those of the user and do not reflect the views of The Pharmacist. Remember that submission of comments is governed by our Terms and Conditions. You can also read our full guidelines on article comments here – but please be aware that you are legally liable for any libellous or offensive comments that you make. If you have a complaint about a comment or are concerned that a comment breaches our terms and conditions, please use the ‘Report this comment’ function to alert our web team.